Vulnerability, Discernment and the Invitation

What exactly are we being invited into with disclosure around the corner? Are they visiting us or are we joining them?

The Awakening Void, Part Two

Galactywood is here, but it’s not funny.

In Part One we laughed at first.

Then we sobered up rather quickly when we began to recognize the psychological implications of what may be unfolding before us.

Nearly fifty years ago, Steven Spielberg gave us Close Encounters of the Third Kind.

Now, almost fifty years later, he returns with Disclosure Day at precisely the moment when disclosure culture, UAP culture, galactic federation narratives and mass awakening movements are converging within the collective imagination.

Coincidence or not, the timing is fascinating.

The most important question is no longer: Are they real?

The deeper question is:

What version of the future are we being primed to accept?

In Part One of The Awakening Void, I took a humorous look at Galactywood, cosmic celebrity culture, disclosure influencers, interstellar fashion runways and humanity’s remarkable ability to recreate Hollywood wherever it goes.

But beneath the laughter lies a much deeper question.

Have we confused fascination with transformation?

And are we being invited into sovereignty...

or simply a bigger stage with a bigger governing aparatus?

Galactywood is not merely a collection of entertaining stories, it represents an emerging vision of humanity’s future.

A future populated by federations, councils, upgrades, initiations, memberships, rankings, celestial celebrities and benevolent authorities.

Anyone but us.

A future that appears radically new on the surface, yet begins to look strangely familiar upon closer inspection.

Which raises a fascinating possibility.

What if the old industrial model was never transcended at all?

What if it was simply projected onto a galactic screen?

At first glance this may seem like a strange question.

After all, what is wrong with making contact with other civilizations?

Nothing at all.

The existence of life beyond Earth does not automatically imply danger, deception or hidden agendas. It simply means that humanity is not alone.

But there is an important distinction that often goes unnoticed.

Are they visiting us?

Or are we joining them?

These are not the same proposition.

One suggests contact between civilizations.

The other suggests integration into a larger civilization.

One leaves Earth at the center of humanity’s story.

The other gradually shifts the center elsewhere.

The difference may seem subtle at first, yet it carries profound implications for how we view ourselves, our future and our place within Creation.

For if the arrivals are just a visitation, Earth remains Earth.

Humanity remains humanity.

The relationship is one of encounter.

It may also be the beginning of a lasting relationship, one that could eventually reshape how we view ourselves as sovereign beings of Earth and our place within Creation.

But more about that later. Much more!

If, however, the narrative gradually shifts toward federations, councils, memberships, rankings, initiations, upgrades and galactic citizenship, something else begins to emerge.

The conversation is no longer simply about who they are.

It becomes about how these visitations affect us.

How they influence the way we view ourselves.

How they shape our understanding of humanity’s future.

And perhaps most importantly, how they influence our relationship with Earth and Creation itself.

For before we decide whether a destination is desirable, we must first understand what is being exchanged.

And that is where discernment enters the picture.

The Pre-Ancient Wisdom Teachings

So what guidance do the Cloister-Dora-Teura (CDT) Plates offer when navigating the Awakening Void?

Surprisingly, they do not present a list of approved teachers, approved movements or approved galactic affiliations. Instead, they return again and again to a single principle: sovereignty.

Not sovereignty as rebellion. Not sovereignty as isolation. Not sovereignty as the rejection of guidance itself. Rather, sovereignty as the restoration of the direct relationship between the individual and Source.

This distinction is profound.

Throughout history, many systems have sought to position themselves between humanity and truth, between humanity and wisdom, and ultimately between humanity and its own knowing, participation and organic spiritual evolution.

The CDT material repeatedly directs attention back to the original Angelic Human design and its innate capacity to reconnect with Creation directly. In this view, the purpose of authentic teaching is not to become an intermediary, but to help restore what was always present here on Earth.

This does not mean refusing to learn from others, in this case: a myriad of off-world entities.

It means refusing to surrender the responsibility of discernment.

It means recognizing that no teacher, no movement, no channeler, no galactic group and no authority can replace the living relationship between consciousness and Creation itself, that we inherently carry within our human vessels.

One of the most valuable insights I have found within the CDT teachings is that authentic guidance can be distinguished by what it strengthens.

Authentic guidance strengthens our relationship with Creation.

It expands participation.

It restores capability.

It encourages stewardship and responsibility here on Earth.

Most importantly, it returns power to the individual rather than asking the individual to hand that power over.

Counterfeit guidance often appears remarkably similar on the surface. It may speak of healing, evolution, ascension and planetary transformation. It may use the same language, the same promises and even many of the same aspirations. Yet over time it produces a different outcome.

Participation gives way to dependency. Capability gives way to reliance. Sovereignty, if ever attained, gradually shifts toward external authority.

This is the most important point of all.

Whatever future is being promised, whatever civilization is being described and whatever destination is being held before us, the discernment test is still taking place here on Earth.

The Awakening Void is happening on Earth.

The choices are being made on Earth.

The trajectory is being established on Earth.

Sovereignty is not demonstrated through theory, affiliation or belief. It is demonstrated through participation. Through stewardship. Through responsibility. Through the living relationship between consciousness and Creation as it unfolds here and now.

For if we cannot embody these principles on Earth, what reason do we have to believe we will suddenly embody them somewhere else?

The real play is already underway.

And it is taking place on Earth.

This is why the distinction can be so difficult to recognize within the Awakening Void. The language may sound almost identical. The promises may appear equally compelling. The difference is revealed not by the message itself, but by the trajectory it creates.

And trajectories reveal far more than promises ever will.

Promises and Prose

One of the most valuable discernment tools I have ever encountered emerged from a surprisingly simple realization. The answer does not lie in what a group claims, what dimension it says it comes from, how beautiful its representatives appear or how advanced its technology seems to be. Nor is the question even how much truth a teaching may contain.

The question is far simpler, and far more revealing:

what does following this path produce?

After years of engagement, does it invite my participation, not as a follower, but as a co-creator in the greater healing of the cosmos, the Earth and ultimately my own becoming? Does it cultivate greater stewardship, greater responsibility, greater embodiment and greater creativity? Does it deepen a meaningful relationship with Earth and Creation itself, one so natural and alive that no control is required?

Or does it create increasing dependence upon external information, external validation, external authorities and external intervention?

Am I in the audience or am I in the play?

Am I being invited to participate in Creation?

Or am I being invited to watch someone else’s version of it?

That question alone has the power to reveal more than countless promises, declarations and spiritual credentials.

Because every teaching ultimately produces a trajectory.

Some trajectories lead toward greater participation in life. Others lead toward greater dependence upon those who claim to understand life on our behalf.

The language used by both can sound remarkably similar. Both may speak of healing. Both may speak of awakening. Both may speak of ascension, transformation and humanity’s future. Yet over time the destination reveals itself.

Because trajectories reveal far more than promises ever will.

Intentions VS Outcomes

These are not comfortable questions.

Yet they are necessary ones.

Throughout history, the most effective deceptions never announced themselves as such. They arrive wrapped in the language of salvation, protection and guidance. Much like politicians seeking office, they present themselves as the solution to genuine problems, offering compelling visions of the future and promises that sound entirely reasonable at the time.

The difficulty is that promises are evaluated in the present, while outcomes reveal themselves much later. By the time the consequences become visible, the trajectory has often already been established. This is why discernment requires us to look beyond words, beyond intentions and beyond appearances.

The challenge is not determining who sounds benevolent. The challenge is determining whether the outcomes of a teaching, movement or influence genuinely strengthen humanity’s sovereignty, capability and relationship with Creation. Does it encourage us to participate more fully in our own evolution, or does it gradually persuade us to place that responsibility elsewhere?

Intentions are easy to claim. Promises are easy to make. Outcomes, however, are far more difficult to counterfeit.

In Closing

Not unlike controlled opposition on Earth, some of the most compelling narratives leave out the carry-through. Beautiful truths, inspiring promises and uplifting visions can conceal assumptions, dependencies and obligations that only become visible much later.

We imagine all earthly red tape, hierarchy and bureaucracy disappearing in some future realm, only to discover that new versions of the same dynamics have quietly followed us there.

The Awakening Void is not created by a lack of information. It is created by the gap between what we have left behind and what we are still in the process of becoming. Many voices rush to fill that gap. Some offer genuine insights. Others offer certainty, belonging, status and ready-made answers. The challenge is learning the difference.

What do not seek a different and exotic variation of an authority structure.

The question is no longer whether aliens exist.

The question is:

What is the nature of the relationship?

Am I simply being visited?

Or am I being invited to visit as well?

Because if so...

You could not pry me off this Earth with a crowbar.

Not because of prejudice.

Not because of fear.

And not because I lack curiosity about what may exist beyond our world.

For if the Awakening Void is filled with new authority structures, then what exactly are we being invited to participate in?

That question led me toward a much larger vision of humanity’s role in the healing of Earth and the living architecture of Creation.

Are we being called away from Earth, and if so why?

When it comes to something as significant as disclosure, humanity needs a role in the trajectory.

We need our voices heard.

And we need a say in our future.

If The Awakening Void asks how we discern our way through a landscape filled with promises, influences and competing narratives, then The New Frontier: Earthealing helps us navigate the field before the goal posts get moved beyond our reach.

Peace All Ways,

Jane

Many have read it, but if you missed it, you can read it here:

The New Frontier: Earthealing